[ QUOTE ]
I beg to differ, but this is a pathetic side by side comparison by a so called real person reviewer....It appears to be no more than a botched attempt to knock the competition. I have never shot a 5D, but have shot a 20D, and it was a joy to use and produced excellent images. I am confident that the 5D is even better. I recently had the pleasure of shooting with a D200, and the images it produced were TACK SHARP right out of the camera, with no in camera sharpening. And to top it off, this so called real person used one the sharpest lenses Nikon has ever produced.......What a joke!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
I beg to differ with you..
After owning a pair of 20D bodies for a year, I bought a 5D body.
The images from the 5D body weren't slightly better by any means. They were HUGELY better.
BTW,......did you see the test between the 20D & the D200 on their site? Will you be suggesting that they made a "botched attempt to knock the competition"..(Canon)...& are a total joke after reviewing their results?
BTW, in the 5D vs D200 test, "the guy" used a 135mm f2.0 L lens for the Canon, which is one of Canon's sharpest lenses ever, too. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] They used the Nikon 85mm f1.4 lens for the D200.
I don't know guy,....it doesn't seem so lopsided to me..