Glamour, Beauty, Nude, Models, Photographers


*    |  Register  


 
Go Back   Garage Glamour™ > Garage Glamour™ Main Forums > Tech Talk Forum
Models, Photographers, Makeup Artists, Forums, Photo Tips, Digital Photography
 

Tech Talk Forum Photography & Technical Related Only!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: RAW not so good??
Old 12-16-2004, 07:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
Lifetime Photographer
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Member GG#: 38485
Location: Tyler
Posts: 312
Comments: 0

photoTexas is offline IP: 63.185.104.90
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

I told told by "the Man" a guy I know at apple that photoshop USM does a lot better job of sharpening than the raw converter.. And try that layer trick I just told you about... I am starting to use it....
  View Public Profile Send a private message to photoTexas Find More Posts by photoTexas
 
Re: RAW not so good??
Old 12-16-2004, 08:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
JohnPaul
Guest
 
Member GG#:
Posts: n/a
Comments:

IP: 66.94.222.56
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

[ QUOTE ]
Open a RAW image.... next to settings click on the arrow and go to preferences, change the first to sidecar.xmp file so your data travels with you and change sharpening to preview only. Sharpen in photoshop at the end. Also try merging all layers onto a new layer, doing a high pass filter at about a 2 on it, then changing it to soft light... now how do you like those apples?


[/ QUOTE ]

Well,... thank you very much... The settings part with the sharpening did make a diference...however, I barely know anything about working with layers.. I just know enough to type my name on them, change the style, move it to where I want to..and flatten it all down.. honestly, that's it.. I probably need to do a little catching up at this point but I'll bookmark your suggestions for future reference..

Thanks a ton for your help! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

JP
 
 
Re: RAW not so good??
Old 12-16-2004, 08:47 PM   #13 (permalink)
JohnPaul
Guest
 
Member GG#:
Posts: n/a
Comments:

IP: 66.94.222.56
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote



well thank you for your replies here... I believe that most of my trouble here is my lack of knowledge of how to use PS.. I am going to have to study up on it.. perhaps take a course in it..or something... the books that I have aren't the best in explaining it to me either.. I'm the type of learner who learns by watching and doing.....reading text puts me to sleep..

Thank you again!

JP
 
 
Re: RAW not so good??
Old 12-16-2004, 10:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
Lifetime Photographer

 
gregkdavis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Member GG#: 38674
Location: Houston
Posts: 381
Comments: 0

gregkdavis is offline IP: 66.19.90.186
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

I've only shot digital a couple of times but I've learned two things.
One---Narrow exposure latitude!
--------- I have to be more on target than I do with transparencies.
Two --- calibrate calibrate calibrate! automate and batch process RAW to TIFF.

Because I do a lot of print work ( everything is calibrated to 56K).
All my pallets and color scripts are planned in advance.

I just burn my RAW files to CD for archival purposes and use my Tiffs for post
production work.

Photoshop is cool but you have to study it. I would recommend those classroom
in a book series Adobe prints.

Greg.


  View Public Profile Send a private message to gregkdavis Visit gregkdavis's homepage! Find More Posts by gregkdavis
 
Re: RAW not so good??
Old 12-17-2004, 07:25 AM   #15 (permalink)
Photographer, Poet

 
jburian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Member GG#: 35356
Location: Moscow
Posts: 14
Comments: 0
My Mood:
Send a message via AIM to jburian Send a message via MSN to jburian Send a message via Yahoo to jburian

jburian is offline IP: 65.206.46.218
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Since getting Pixel Genius's PK Sharpener, I shoot everything (RAW) with sharpening turned off in the camera. I do the initial RAW conversion in Nikon Capture, it seems to do a slightly better job than PS CS. Once in PS, I use PK Sharpener with awesome results. It consists of three seperate sharpening steps that are fine-tuned to your specific needs. The Creative Sharpening can be applied with brushes if you'd like which allows you to selectively sharpen areas in the picture. This software is definitely worth checking out. Here's a link to their site... Photo Kit Sharpener

Jeff
  View Public Profile Send a private message to jburian Visit jburian's homepage! Find More Posts by jburian
 
Raw is War spelled backwards ....
Old 12-17-2004, 10:45 AM   #16 (permalink)
Free Member

 
R_Fredrick_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Member GG#: 35872
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth Area
Posts: 3,801
Comments: 42

R_Fredrick_Smith is offline IP: 67.162.234.198
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Often discussions of RAW turn into a war of words. I use Raw part of the time and JPG, the rest. How do I decide? I depends on the lighting. If I have to shoot fast and the light is changing fast and I don't have time to do custom white balance, then I shoot RAW. If I am doing product photography I always shoot RAW since you often need to enhance part of the photo quite a bit especially when doing wide black to white ranges. But if you shoot a properly white balance well exposed JPG, then it will look just as good as the RAW equivalent (all things else being equal). Sometimes it can be puzzling though to know which is better ...



Cheers,
rfs

Cheers,
rfs
  View Public Profile Send a private message to R_Fredrick_Smith Visit R_Fredrick_Smith's homepage! Find More Posts by R_Fredrick_Smith
 
Re: RAW not so good??
Old 12-17-2004, 11:25 AM   #17 (permalink)
JohnPaul
Guest
 
Member GG#:
Posts: n/a
Comments:

IP: 66.94.222.117
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote



Thanx Jeff.. I'm looking into that right now..

I like the idea of haveing selective control.. Is there a "general" setting that you like to you that you could recommend for the overall picture? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

JP
 
 
Re: Raw is War spelled backwards ....
Old 12-17-2004, 11:28 AM   #18 (permalink)
JohnPaul
Guest
 
Member GG#:
Posts: n/a
Comments:

IP: 66.94.222.117
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote



Great points...thank you!

JP
 
 
Re: RAW not so good??
Old 12-17-2004, 12:56 PM   #19 (permalink)
Biker by the Grace of God

 
dynamike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Member GG#: 35237
Location: St Marys
Posts: 1,578
Comments: 0

dynamike is offline IP: 69.21.92.10
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

That is awesome!!!

Thanks so much for the tip!

Mike
  View Public Profile Send a private message to dynamike Visit dynamike's homepage! Find More Posts by dynamike
 
Camera Raw Saving Highlights
Old 12-17-2004, 08:34 PM   #20 (permalink)
Lifetime Photographer

 
CaptainKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Member GG#: 39640
Location: Aurora
Posts: 207
Comments: 0

CaptainKen is offline IP: 69.25.212.3
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

JP
There is an interesting article in Photoshop user Magazine Jan/Feb issue regarding using camera raw to save highlights. It’s to difficult to explain here, but basically you open the camera raw dialog twice. Lower the exposure enough in one of the images to bring back detail in the highlight area and click ok. Once you have two PS images open, choose the move tool (V), hold down the shift key and drag it onto the lighter image. Next hold down the Option key or PC alt key and click the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers palette, it’s the circle in a square. The article recommends selecting a soft edged brush with 25% opacity. Set the foreground color to white, click on the darker highlights mask to make it active and paint white over the areas that had no details in the highlights. If you haven’t used layers mask before painting with white reveals what is underneath, painting with black conceals the bottom layer so if you reveal to much while painting with white just change the foreground color to black and paint back some black. I think of painting with white on a black mask the same as erasing the mask to reveal the bottom image. I probably was way to brief to make any sense but if you got it great, if not send me a note or call and I’ll fill in any holes if this sounds like something that would be useful.
Ken
  View Public Profile Send a private message to CaptainKen Find More Posts by CaptainKen
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Google


New To Site? Need Help? Photographer & Model Links
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.

© 1999-2009 Garage Glamour™




Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100