New work with two very different models

[bratsscrappy]

Please give me your feedback and critique. Click for larger versions.

[Navigator]

#1 is very yellow/orange on my screen. Bit dark too.

Peter

[BobEdens]

I agree with #1 being too orange, its the walls.
#2 is the best of the three, don't like the shadows from the tree but the pose I like a lot.

[daalanis]

I feel dirty now, agree with other comments though.

[kgphoto]

Lots of amputation going on. Starting with the first image and the left hand of the lower model. It adds nothing, covers nothing and is only a distraction.

Very pretty girls, but exposure and lighting need to be refined. Distracting shadows on the last image and high light shadow contrast on the second. The first looks underexposed, so hard to tell the rest.

[Titan]

the first one is fun and flirty, but too orangey and dark,

I'm not crazy about the tree shadows or the leaves on the ground in the second one, but I love the pose, with her diagonal like that, she looks really long, and it shows her figure really well.

The 3rd one is only so so, # 2 is definetly the strongest of the three.

[ProShotPhoto]

I like the first in terms of composition but as everyone says the white balance is way off but that poses had the most potential if the two girls could have expressed .

The pose in the second is interesting as someone said it elongates her shape but her she can enhance that further by pointing or being on her toes rather than standing flat footed on her heels. This will improve the look of her feet and toes as well. There is also an unflattering shadow across her nose and face.

The third one does not do anything for me and actually reminds me how unskilled these girls are as models.

All of the photos and the models will benefit from any amount of post processing or even a small effort to finish them

[Jet1]

Have to agree with the others...
First shot is soft as is the third, but not as badly. First is a good idea and worth a reshoot, but you have to correct the white balance issues and maybe go to a faster lens to diffuse the background a bit more (especailly imortant if shooting only using available light).

Second works the best out of the three, but has all the elements and imperfections of a casual snapshot on the back porch some saturday afternoon. (the pose is great, the composition and lighting...not so much.

From a technical perspective #3 has more wrong with it than right...sometimes one can pull that off, but not this time. Again, pay attention to composition, background elements, shadow/light, framing.

By all means keep shooting, and keep asking questions, and you'll see yourself improving by leaps and bounds if you focus and pay attention. I'm not trying to *bust balls* really, but I was kinda shocked at the comments left on Mayhem, they were either being extremely polite and gracious, or they just don't know any better. Sorry if I've offended you with this post, but it is meant to be constructive and give you positive steps you can take to improve your photos going forward.

[rolandogomez]

bratsscrappy, in the future, please load your images on this site and not link to other sites unless it's your own personal site. Besides, many people block pop-out boxes like you set here and we're not here to redirect traffic to your MM site. Thanks, rg.

[Rich]

Playful girls should never look posed.......above critiques have covered most points.