Lens Diaries Go Now
Glamour, Beauty, Nude, Models, Photographers

*    |  Register  


 
Go Back   Garage Glamour™ > Garage Glamour™ Main Forums > Main Community Forum
 

Main Community Forum General Modeling & Photography Forum
Adult posts prohibited!>>Please Read Our GUIDELINES before posting!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
New Law Would Burden Photographers
Old 12-13-2006, 01:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
glamourpics
Guest
 
Member GG#:
Posts: n/a
Comments:

IP: 76.173.245.75
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

A proposed law would impose tremendous reporting burdens on virtually anyone (at least U.S.-based) who maintains a web presence and allows other people to post images. The law might cover written text as well. The bill, according to legal authorities, goes well beyond the bounds of constitutionality. However, what usually happens is that some of the more odious or obviously illegal parts get trimmed away, leaving the bill purportedly constitutional. Some of the discussion of the bill centered around obligations of search engines, which have until now been free of the reporting/recordkeeping obligations imposed on ISP's. It would also impose heavy obligations on this board. (Other boards have closed because of uncertainty of the existing 18 USC 2257 regulations) Here are some details of the proposed law:

=============================================

Senator: Illegal images must be reported.

Millions of commercial Web sites and personal blogs would be required to report illegal images or videos posted by their users or pay fines of up to $300,000, if a new proposal in the U.S. Senate came into law. The legislation, drafted by Sen. John McCain and obtained by CNET News.com, would also require Web sites that offer user profiles to delete pages posted by sex offenders. In a speech on the Senate floor Wednesday, the Arizona Republican and former presidential candidate warned that "technology has contributed to the greater distribution and availability, and, some believe, desire for child pornography." McCain scored 31 of 100 points on a News.com 2006 election guide scoring technology-related votes. After child pornography or some forms of "obscenity" are found and reported, the Web site must retain any "information relating to the facts or circumstances" of the incident for at least six months. Webmasters would be immune from civil and criminal liability if they followed the specified procedures exactly. McCain's proposal, called the "Stop the Online Exploitation of Our Children Act" requires that reports be submitted to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which in turn will forward them to the relevant police agency. (The organization received $32.6 million in tax dollars in 2005, according to its financial disclosure documents.) Internet service providers already must follow those reporting requirements. But McCain's proposal is liable to be controversial because it levies the same regulatory scheme--and even stiffer penalties--on even individual bloggers who offer discussion areas on their Web sites. It is also controversial because it puts the burden on such businesses not only to manually review all images, but to make legal judgments as to "legality," a test which even courts argue about. According to the proposed legislation, these types of individuals or businesses would be required to file reports: any Web site with a message board; any chat room; any social-networking site; any e-mail service; any instant-messaging service; any Internet content hosting service; any domain name registration service; any Internet search service; any electronic communication service; and any image or video-sharing service.
 
 
Re: New Law Would Burden Photographers
Old 12-13-2006, 04:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Free Member

 
R_Fredrick_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Member GG#: 35872
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth Area
Posts: 3,691
Comments: 41

R_Fredrick_Smith is offline IP: 76.186.138.200
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Wouldn't it make more sense to post the link to the article that you are directly quoting. Usually it is considered a violation of copyright, even under the fair use clause, to make a quote from copyrighted material and not cite where the quote came from, etc.

Cheers,
rfs
__________________

"The map is not the Territory"
  View Public Profile Send a private message to R_Fredrick_Smith Visit R_Fredrick_Smith's homepage! Find More Posts by R_Fredrick_Smith
 
Re: More Info, action by search engine companies
Old 12-14-2006, 02:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
glamourpics
Guest
 
Member GG#:
Posts: n/a
Comments:

IP: 76.173.245.75
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

I have read unconfirmed information which I believe to be accurate, that Google and at least one other major search engine are lobbying to incorporate exemptions, narrowly-tailored to only exempt themselves, while leaving the burden heavy on other sites and internet operations. Google et. al.'s actions are to be expected, and it is also to be expected that they will act as quietly as possible, knowing that any smell of 'special treatment' for Google would anger competitors, web denizens, and the public. Or at least the public that cares about fairness and even handedness.
 
 
Re: New Law Would Burden Photographers
Old 12-15-2006, 07:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
Lifetime Photographer

 
photoshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Member GG#: 35411
Location: Bloomingdale, IL
Posts: 273
Comments: 12
My Mood:

photoshooter is offline IP: 67.163.86.244
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

It would seem that the senator who introduced this legislature is no other than John McCain of Arizona. It appears that he is aiming to cripple liberal bloggers along with purveyors of porno, here is the link: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/13/...-war-on-blogs/ The said senator has White House aspiration so he will sacrifice freedon of speech to win neocon's votes. Interesting, after all, politics make strange bedfellows. History is about to repeat itself again and again.
__________________
Everybody loves a camera, but the camera loves back only a few, they are the photogenic ones.

  View Public Profile Send a private message to photoshooter Visit photoshooter's homepage! Find More Posts by photoshooter
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An abundance of good photographers..... BenE Model Topics 25 01-19-2011 02:54 PM
(Extract of) Interview with 'Vivid Girl' Lux Kassidy re: Photographers jimmyd Main Community Forum 0 06-13-2006 01:34 PM
are photographers being photographers? rephoto1 Main Community Forum 25 01-23-2006 06:02 PM
Tables Turned on the Photographers Brattitude Main Community Forum 25 10-26-2005 05:34 PM
This is why I can't stand "Model Managers" who dub as "Photographers" JohnPaul Main Community Forum 58 10-17-2005 10:21 AM

Sponsors


New To Site? Need Help? Photographer & Model Links
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.

© 1999-2017 Garage Glamour™




Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94