Lens Diaries Go Now
Glamour, Beauty, Nude, Models, Photographers

*    |  Register  


 
Go Back   Garage Glamour™ > Garage Glamour™ Main Forums > Main Community Forum
 

Main Community Forum General Modeling & Photography Forum
Adult posts prohibited!>>Please Read Our GUIDELINES before posting!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
H.R. 4472 Signed Into Law
Old 07-27-2006, 08:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Pro Shooter

 
jimmyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Member GG#: 38375
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,078
Comments: 2

jimmyd is offline IP: 70.34.196.35
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Chicken Little reports:

WASHINGTON — Amending the 2257 federal record-keeping requirement, President Bush signed the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 before a White House crowd that included “America’s Most Wanted” host John Walsh, for whose son the bill is named.

While H.R. 4472 takes dramatic steps to protect children, such as creating a national sex offender registry, it also reshapes the 2257 playing field, according to Free Speech Coalition attorney Jeffrey Douglas, who said that the law mandates that so-called secondary producers — a group that likely includes adult webmasters — will be required to comply with 2257.

In addition to expanding liability to secondary producers, the proposed law also mandates record-keeping for films and images containing depictions of “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.”

According to Douglas, that means that exhibitions of mere nudity could fall under the 2257 record-keeping regime.

President Bush signed the bill July 27, the anniversary of the abduction of Adam Walsh, who was abducted from a Hollywood, Fla. Sears department store in 1981 at age 6. His severed head was later found, however the rest of his remains are still missing. His killer is still at large.

Chicken Little sez: I'm guessing this law will be challenged and its going to end up in the supreme court who will, at the very least, have to legally define "lascivious." Webster defines this adjective as "1. Given to or expressing lust; lecherous. 2. Exciting sexual desires; salacious. but we all know lawyers and politicians aren't much for allowing words to mean what they, uhh... mean. Also, please note this part of the bill has VERY LITTLE to do with children. Gee. How'd that happen? Congratulations to everyone here. You might now have to prove you're not a criminal without law enforcement needing probable cause. Also note the burden of proof has been shifted to you.
__________________
I'm not an art critic but I think I know a good picture when I see one.


My NSFW blog
: http://prettygirlshooter.blogspot.com
  View Public Profile Send a private message to jimmyd Visit jimmyd's homepage! Find More Posts by jimmyd
Last edited by jimmyd; 07-27-2006 at 08:44 PM..
 
Re: H.R. 4472 Signed Into Law
Old 07-28-2006, 10:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Lifetime Photographer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Member GG#: 35723
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 474
Comments: 0

Dman65 is offline IP: 63.243.17.130
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Now JimmyD,

You can't go and bad mouth anything that is done "for the children."

I personally am totally for protecting children, don't get me wrong. If you want to punish a piece of slime who has sexually abused a child feel free to lock me in a room with him for a couple of hours and I will guarantee he will never harm anyone again.

That being said, politicians like nothing more than to use children as political pawns for their agenda whether it be a conservative one or a liberal one. And once an agenda is pronounced as being "for the children" who can possibly be against it? That would mean being "against the children."
  View Public Profile Send a private message to Dman65 Find More Posts by Dman65
 
Re: H.R. 4472 Signed Into Law
Old 07-28-2006, 01:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Free Member

 
gwphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Member GG#: 38692
Location: Thornton
Posts: 46
Comments: 0

gwphoto is offline IP: 12.170.37.86
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

GOOD for President Bush. Now what happen to the NO POLITICS RULE......
  View Public Profile Send a private message to gwphoto Visit gwphoto's homepage! Find More Posts by gwphoto
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just signed up Frederick_P Introduce Yourself 4 05-26-2011 08:30 AM
Signed Photo Books? ericski Main Community Forum 1 12-09-2010 12:44 AM

Sponsors


New To Site? Need Help? Photographer & Model Links
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.

© 1999-2017 Garage Glamour™




Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93