Lens Diaries Go Now
Glamour, Beauty, Nude, Models, Photographers

*    |  Register  


 
Go Back   Garage Glamourô > Garage Glamourô Main Forums > Main Community Forum
 

Main Community Forum General Modeling & Photography Forum
Adult posts prohibited!>>Please Read Our GUIDELINES before posting!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
This deserves a thread of itís own.
Old 06-26-2006, 12:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Member GG#: 35436
Location: Sunset
Posts: 500
Comments: 0

cclesue is offline IP: 67.169.240.204
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

This is something that comes up every once in a while from both photographers and models on this forum.
Refer to :http://www.glamour1.com/forums/main-...ded#post223705

Quote:
we all know the difference between porn and fine-art nude: fine-art nude is monochrome.
Meant as a joke Iím sure but it reflects an attitude that keeps serious artists and photographers forever labeled as smutters. I suppose when I was a kid I took any picture of a nekkid woman as something to titter over with my Jr. high buddies behind the barn. But then I grew up. I suppose it was about the time I photographed my first nude that I discovered it was something far more than Mule loping fodder. The intensity of was not, nor has it even been, sexual for me. Instead I viewed the young and vibrant subjects as giving me the opportunity to photograph their most intimate and basic selves. And the outcome depended on me, my meager tools and even lesser talent, to lift it beyond tawdry to something sublime. A sublime, I have come to realize, never to be enjoyed by far too many in this society since their appreciation never rose above the belt line, and these same people think it is so for everyone. Well it ainít!
Somewhere along the line I learned to sift through the plethora of images set before me and elevate the deserving above the groin area to where I could study and appreciate what it took to make it what is was: FINE art.
As fellow geezer Lester (from Georgia whose talent far exceeds mine) will, Iím sure, attest desaturation does not a fine art nude make. Stripped of the accouterments of ďcivilizationĒ and the sometime hinderments of color, a fine art nude becomes the simplest form of artistic expression. The simplest and perhaps therefore the hardest because the artist palette is limited to only the basics of light, shadow and composition. Attention to and an understanding of these three basics makes or breaks the Fine in fine art. But then isnít this true of every great image? Itís just that the fine art nude doesnít get to camouflage anything.
To me the elegance of a true fine art nude is the ultimate compliment to the greatest creation on Gods earth...
__________________
Paranoia does not preclude persecution.
  View Public Profile Send a private message to cclesue Visit cclesue's homepage! Find More Posts by cclesue
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The running critique thread .... R_Fredrick_Smith Photo Reviews & Critiques Only 18 09-21-2011 08:27 PM
Workshop in a thread ... R_Fredrick_Smith Digital Darkroom 2 12-13-2006 06:01 PM

Sponsors


New To Site? Need Help? Photographer & Model Links
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM.

© 1999-2017 Garage Glamourô




Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93