1,2,3 or none of the above!!

[ QUOTE ]
and don't forget to use the goose-bump removal tool.

[/ QUOTE ]


NO WAY!!!!!! texture!!! man Texture!!


[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[ARTFORMS]

I like the concept you have going here and think that my preference would be the first one out of the group. I would like to see this same image shot again with some subtle light on DeAnn's face. Just enough to see a little detail from her eyes nose and mouth.

Jim

[PrimeJive]

You need the face on all three

[ QUOTE ]
You need the face on all three

[/ QUOTE ]


wasnt going for the face...was going for the contrast between the two models...light and darkness..softness and texture......the missing face leaves a sense of mystery to the image....
but oh well! foiled again!!
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[jimmyd]

texture's great. but maybe a bit less in this instance when it looks like she had her feathers recently plucked. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[PrimeJive]

Even if it's just a little more of the face, she looks like she's melting not like mystery.
J.urdaneta

[ QUOTE ]
but maybe a bit less in this instance when it looks like she had her feathers recently plucked

[/ QUOTE ]



See now I never thought of it like that....sometimes smart ass honesty works!!
I see it now!!!

Don.

[rjwarren]

If you need help with that re-shoot, let me know!

[jimmyd]

now that's what i'm talking about.