Originally Posted by CatCynic
It's certain not the normal kind of photo we get here - there's no lingerie! (hmm, now that could make a wicked photo...) It's arguably glamour photography, though
Yeah, chicks and guns are always nice. Or did you mean lingerie on the gun itself?
In the pic I was trying to replicate, the light fell off a little bit on the stock, but not as much as how it does here. The colors weren't the same either (the background in the magazine pic was red, and the accent lighting on the gun was green instead of orange here). But we didn't have to do everything just exactly like how it was in the original, but I think more as close as we could get while in keeping true to the style of the original. Or something like that.
For instance, the gun they used on the cover I could never get my hands on, unless I was in the army or something.
Oh, and the spill on the grip was NOT intended... I didn't notice it 'til after I was done.
I only really wanted the orange light on the clip and heat guard areas. Oh well, maybe next time...
Thanks for the reply!