View Single Post
Re: Need Help: Digital vs. Film in the Photography Industry
Old 05-03-2004, 03:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Photomart
Free Member

 
Photomart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Member GG#: 36974
Location: Dallas Fort Worth
Posts: 866
Comments: 0
My Mood:

Photomart is offline IP: 24.0.203.126
  Reply With Quote

Before digital cameras, it took a lot of investment to be a photographer. Shooting TFP was an expensive proposition. Today, I run into a lot of "Glamour" photographers, and many say they got into shooting women a few years ago because "digital is cheap and gives me immediate feedback." The downside-- the advent of digital photography has allowed a lot of crappy photographers and scam artists to enter our business. The upside -- the immediate feedback of digital has helped many talented photographers become even better.

My opinion -- digital will continue to grow more mainstream, film will continue be religated to the hard core and the artsy. My hope -- that the art directors at advertising agencies and magazines start giving digital photographers more credibility and stop asking to see our transparancies (because it costs a lot of money to turn my digital images into transparancies - LOL).
  View Public Profile Send a private message to Photomart Visit Photomart's homepage! Find More Posts by Photomart