View Single Post
Re: Continuous -vs- Strobe
Old 04-17-2008, 08:05 PM   #21 (permalink)
isaiahbrink
Free Member

 
isaiahbrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member GG#: 39216
Location: Salisbury
Posts: 1,171
Comments: 2
Send a message via MSN to isaiahbrink Send a message via Yahoo to isaiahbrink

isaiahbrink is offline IP: 70.133.197.84
  Reply With Quote

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyd View Post
Fluorescents, like KinoFlo's products, are great. Modifying for "softness" isn't a big deal as they are inherently soft. They can be a bit difficult to control as they scatter the light widely. But you can use them with grids and, of course, flags can be a great help too. With Kinos or other fluorescents, you'll be shooting at high ISOs, with wide apertures and slow shutters. You'll probly start seeing photographers shooting with LitePanels as that technology migrates from film and television production to still photography.
Just curious Jimmy, I'm used to using modifiers like snoots and barn doors, of course with the normal "hot" lights. I imagine since like you said, they are naturally soft, one wouldn't need a soft box, diffuser, or the like, but would you be able to use some of the old standards like a snoot or a barn door? Oh, I'm probabbly wrong, but when you mention I have the pic in my head that they are the normal long tubes we are used to seeing in buildings and what not. Are CFB's (compat flourecent bulbs) availble with the daylight balance?
__________________
I know that I am one with beauty, And that my comrades are one. Let our souls be mountains, Let our spirtis be stars, Let our hearts be worlds.
  View Public Profile Send a private message to isaiahbrink Find More Posts by isaiahbrink