Quote:
Originally Posted by glamourpics
(Various ad hominem attacks and slurs against me have been deleted)
|
Well, let's see what they were:
Quote:
Originally Posted by R_Fredrick_Smith
It also appears that you have violated the copyright of Rhett Pardon by publishing his article in this post (and it seems you provided no link to the article). I also notice you don't say where the article came from. So essentially your use of this material appears to be a blatant copyright violation.
|
Ad hominem:
A fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute.
RFS's comments are neither fallacies (you did infringe the copyright of the Sacramento Bee) nor are they irrelevant to the issue, as they demonstrate your hypocrisy regarding your one-man copyright infringement crusade.
In both of the following posts you infringened a news organization's copyright by posting the full text of a story without attribute or a link:
http://www.glamour1.com/forums/off-t...more-news.html
http://www.glamour1.com/forums/main-...ographers.html
In the following post you also posted the full text of a story without a link, but at least with attribution:
http://www.glamour1.com/forums/off-t...your-nose.html
Whenever anyone points things like this out, you either ignore it or wave your hands and claim "Fair Use" based on commentary. Part of the Fair Use defense hinges on whether you only quoted as much as needed to illustrate your point/comment/observation/etc. Taking it all is taking too much.
Slur:
a disparaging remark.
The simple fact is that sometimes the truth hurts.