I am vexed, disgusted, and entertained by the thought of a model bringing an escort, chaperone, body guard, security, or another person for the sole purpose of a model's sense of security. Here is why, and pay close attention to the quotation marks:
Models, despite the common stereotype are at least average, and in most cases well endowed with common sense and intelligence. Read the forum posts for proof of my observation. Models don't need an escort because they use common sense and good judgement when they decide who they will work with. When a model checks references, communicates by email and phone--and discovers warning signs with a "photographer", the shoot is off. The model also seems to have a sixth sense which identifies "photographers" as Gentelmen With Camera equipment.
However, when a "model" discovers red flags and potential problems with a "photographer", they will opt to bring another person to the shoot instead of cancelling. The "model" will bring a chaperone, escort, security, or body guard, depending on the number and intensity or the warning signs. Only "models" willingly place themselves in a situation that makes them fear for their own safety so much that they would need to bring an escort for protection. Unlike the model, "models" are drawn to "photographers" like moths to a flame...
If a "photographer" has an uterior motive or is psychotic, another person isn't security, but instead another victim. A "photographer" has time to formulate a plan to deal with escorts or body guards, and they will probably enjoy making that plan as much as they will executing it. In fact, they might even thank the "model" for bringing the extra person along.
Then there is the Security Dilemma, which is usually applied in political science, but fits aptly to this discussion. When a "model" brings security, or arms herself, the photographer will in theory do the same to have the advantage. So, if a "model" brings a body guard, the "photographer" would be inclined to have assurance that his hidden agenda is not hampered in any way. A photographer on the other hand, will likely cancel the shoot with a model that is displaying warning signs of starting a cold war in the studio.
Personally, I have no objections if a model brings someone else with them to a shoot. I object if the "model" feels unsafe, in which case I don't want to work with them anyway. I object because they didn't do their research and check up on me to discover I am likely the person they should feel safest with. In fact, I'm better security than nearly anyone who usually fills the role of an escort.
When a model goes to a shoot, she feels completely comfortable going alone. When a "model" doesn't feel comfortable, that is a warning sign itself is dealt with by a false sense of security. Common sense and good judgement dictate if you feel a need for an escort, something isn't right and so cancel the shoot! Check references, use common sense, and don't do anything that insticts suggest is unsafe. Bring a makeup artist if you just want a witness. I don't know of any photographer (note lack of quotation marks) that will object to a MUA at the models expense...
|